Home  ›  The Academic Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access an Evidence-based Review

The Academic Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access an Evidence-based Review

Written By Monday, April 18, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Review

doi: ten.12688/f1000research.8460.3. eCollection 2016.

The bookish, economical and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review

Affiliations

  • PMID: 27158456
  • PMCID: PMC4837983
  • DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3

Free PMC article

Review

The bookish, economic and societal impacts of Open up Access: an evidence-based review

Jonathan P Tennant  et al. F1000Res. .

Free PMC article

Abstract

Ongoing debates surrounding Open Access to the scholarly literature are multifaceted and complicated by disparate and ofttimes polarised viewpoints from engaged stakeholders. At the current stage, Open Access has become such a global issue that it is critical for all involved in scholarly publishing, including policymakers, publishers, enquiry funders, governments, learned societies, librarians, and academic communities, to be well-informed on the history, benefits, and pitfalls of Open Access. In spite of this, there is a general lack of consensus regarding the potential pros and cons of Open Access at multiple levels. This review aims to be a resource for current knowledge on the impacts of Open Access past synthesizing important research in iii major areas: academic, economical and societal. While at that place is clearly much telescopic for boosted research, several key trends are identified, including a broad citation advantage for researchers who publish openly, as well as additional benefits to the non-academic dissemination of their work. The economical impact of Open up Access is less well-understood, although it is clear that access to the inquiry literature is cardinal for innovative enterprises, and a range of governmental and non-governmental services. Furthermore, Open Access has the potential to relieve both publishers and research funders considerable amounts of financial resource, and tin can provide some economic benefits to traditionally subscription-based journals. The societal touch on of Open Access is strong, in detail for advancing citizen science initiatives, and leveling the playing field for researchers in developing countries. Open up Access supersedes all potential alternative modes of access to the scholarly literature through enabling unrestricted re-utilize, and long-term stability independent of financial constraints of traditional publishers that impede knowledge sharing. Notwithstanding, Open Access has the potential to become unsustainable for enquiry communities if high-cost options are allowed to proceed to prevail in a widely unregulated scholarly publishing marketplace. Open Access remains only ane of the multiple challenges that the scholarly publishing system is currently facing. All the same, information technology provides one foundation for increasing engagement with researchers regarding ethical standards of publishing and the broader implications of 'Open Research'.

Keywords: Altmetrics; Copyright; Incentive System; Open up Admission; Open up Commendation Advantage; Open Science, Text and Data Mining; Publishing.

Conflict of involvement statement

Competing interests: JPT currently blogs for the PLOS Paleo Community, and works for ScienceOpen. CHJH is a Middle for Open Science ambassador. DCJ and FW are members of the Open up Admission Working Grouping of EURODOC. PM is a Inquiry Data Alliance fellow member. LBC works for the University of Pittsburgh, which has an Open Access library publishing department. All views presented here are strictly personal.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage increase in research articles in PubMed Primal, relative to 2000.

Since 2004, the growth charge per unit of OA articles is significantly higher than that of non-OA articles.

Figure 2.
Figure ii.. Studies that investigated the citation advantage grouped by their conclusion.

The majority concluded that at that place is a significant commendation advantage for Open Admission articles. Source: Data from The Open Access Citation Reward Service, SPARC Europe, accessed March 2016.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Cumulative number of Open Access policies adopted by multiple inquiry organisations, funder and enquiry organisation, sub-unit of measurement of inquiry organisation, funder, and enquiry arrangement.

Figures are given at the showtime of each year. Source: ROARMAP, accessed March 2016.

Similar articles

  • A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.

    Suzuki K, Edelson A, Iversen LL, Hausmann Fifty, Schulz JB, Turner AJ. Suzuki K, et al. J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: ten.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17. J Neurochem. 2016. PMID: 27534728 Review.

  • All-time practices for scholarly authors in the age of predatory journals.

    Beall J. Beall J. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016 Feb;98(two):77-nine. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0056. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016. PMID: 26829665 Free PMC commodity.

  • Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Information Quality and Reproducibility.

    Hrynaszkiewicz I. Hrynaszkiewicz I. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2020;257:319-348. doi: 10.1007/164_2019_290. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 31691858

  • Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?

    Baffy G, Burns MM, Hoffmann B, Ramani S, Sabharwal S, Borus JF, Pories S, Quan SF, Ingelfinger JR. Baffy G, et al. Am J Med. 2020 Jan;133(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 13. Am J Med. 2020. PMID: 31419421 Review.

  • Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access.

    Power H. Power H. Tin J Nurs Res. 2018 Mar;50(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/0844562117748287. Epub 2018 January 5. Can J Nurs Res. 2018. PMID: 29301409

Cited by 52 manufactures

  • What senior academics can practice to support reproducible and open research: a short, three-stride guide.

    Kowalczyk Bone, Lautarescu A, Blok E, Dall'Aglio L, Westwood SJ. Kowalczyk Os, et al. BMC Res Notes. 2022 Mar 22;fifteen(1):116. doi: ten.1186/s13104-022-05999-0. BMC Res Notes. 2022. PMID: 35317865 Gratuitous PMC article.

  • Global Oncology Authorship and Readership Patterns.

    Bourlon MT, Jiménez Franco B, Castro-Alonso FJ, Bourlon C, Matar CF, Gunn E, Ginsburg O, Lopes Chiliad, Segelov E. Bourlon MT, et al. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;viii:e2100299. doi: x.1200/Go.21.00299. JCO Glob Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35258989 Free PMC commodity.

  • Dynamics of cumulative reward and threats to equity in open up scientific discipline: a scoping review.

    Ross-Hellauer T, Reichmann Due south, Cole NL, Fessl A, Klebel T, Pontika N. Ross-Hellauer T, et al. R Soc Open Sci. 2022 January xix;9(1):211032. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211032. eCollection 2022 January. R Soc Open Sci. 2022. PMID: 35116143 Costless PMC commodity. Review.

  • Wellness sciences librarians' engagement in open science: a scoping review.

    Giustini D, Read KB, Deardorff A, Federer 50, Rethlefsen ML. Giustini D, et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 October 1;109(iv):540-560. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1256. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021. PMID: 34858084 Free PMC article. Review.

  • Assessing Markers of Reproducibility and Transparency in Smoking Behaviour Change Intervention Evaluations.

    Norris E, He Y, Loh R, W R, Michie Southward. Norris East, et al. J Smok Cessat. 2021 Jan xv;2021:6694386. doi: x.1155/2021/6694386. eCollection 2021. J Smok Cessat. 2021. PMID: 34306236 Free PMC commodity.

References

    1. Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, et al. : Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116(6): 061102. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adcock J, Fottrell Due east: The Northward-South information highway: case studies of publication access amidst health researchers in resource-poor countries. Glob Health Action. 2008;i. 10.3402/gha.v1i0.1865 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adie E: Attending! a study of open access vs non-open access articles. Figshare. 2014. 10.6084/m9.figshare.1213690 - DOI
    1. Allen HG, Stanton TR, Di Pietro F, et al. : Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PLoS One. 2013;viii(7):e68914. x.1371/journal.pone.0068914 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alonso-Gamboa JO, Russell JM: Latin American scholarly periodical databases: a expect back to the way forward.In Aslib Proceedings.Emerald Group Publishing Express,2012;64(1):32–45. 10.1108/00012531211196693 - DOI

Publication types

Grant support

This inquiry was partly funded by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Inquiry through a FRIA grant. PM acknowledges back up from the European Committee Horizon 2020 Programme under Grant Agreement 634107 (PHC32-2014) 'MULTIMOT'.

LinkOut - more than resources

  • Full Text Sources

    • Europe PubMed Primal
    • F1000 Research Ltd
    • PubMed Primal

  • Other Literature Sources

    • scite Smart Citations

  • Miscellaneous

    • NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

mouzonpuppect.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27158456/

0 Response to "The Academic Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access an Evidence-based Review"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel